?Okay, what did I misinterpret?
I just gave an honest opinion which you called "moronic" iirc.
?Okay, what did I misinterpret?
Lay off the sauce, Lee.?
I just gave an honest opinion which you called "moronic" iirc.
?Lay off the sauce, Lee.
On your bike. ??
I was responding to Thready so run along!
So I didn’t misinterpret your post that cyclists should have insurance??
I just gave an honest opinion which you called "moronic" iirc.
?So I didn’t misinterpret your post that cyclists should have insurance?
Or are you back pedalling on that moronic idea now?
If you’re not feel free to respond to previous post.
I answered you in my first post that you know claim you were misinterpreted.?
Why do you think it's moronic Thready?
So you don't know yet you want cyclists to have insurance? Kids cycling their bikes should be insured, they better start saving.
Should people pushing buggies be insured, People walking dogs with long leads, a total trip hazard for pedestrians? Skateboarders?
You do know if someone damages your property, they are liable for repairs, insured or not.
I really do despair at the idiocy on display on this thread at times from the anti-cycling brigade.
Most other public road users have to be insured.
. E.scooters and cyclists do cause accidents even though far fewer than motor vehicles it's fair to
Coherent as always, fair play, enjoy your siesta?
"And the seasons they go round and round and the painted ponies go up and down"!
https://www.theguardian.com/news/ar...-causing-death-or-injury-by-dangerous-cycling
UK to introduce new offence of causing death or injury by dangerous cycling